%20(2).jpg)
Canada's Inspired Priest
The content presented on this page is published exclusively for the purposes of religious commentary, theological analysis, and discussion of matters of public interest. All references to Marc Briesbois are derived from publicly available sources, including but not limited to video recordings, published statements, screenshots, and other material voluntarily placed into the public domain by Marc himself.
Any quotations or paraphrases are presented in good faith and are used for the purposes of criticism, review, and public dialogue within the scope of fair dealing and fair comment.
All evaluative statements regarding doctrine, theology, or ministry practices, including descriptions such as “false,” “unbiblical,” “unsound,” or “heretical,” represent the author’s sincerely held religious opinions and biblical interpretations. These statements do not constitute assertions of criminal conduct, civil liability, fraud, or unlawful behavior.
This publication is not a legal adjudication and must not be interpreted as a determination of guilt, wrongdoing, or legal responsibility. It is a theological and pastoral critique of publicly expressed teachings and ministry activity.
Readers are encouraged to review the original source material directly and to reach their own independent conclusions.
A Warning Against the “Inspired Priest” Teaching
The concept of an “inspired priest,” defined as a combined prophet and teacher role, is not found anywhere in Scripture and is incompatible with clear biblical teaching.
The Bible teaches that all believers are part of a royal priesthood through Christ. “You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation” (1 Peter 2:9). This means every Christian has direct access to God through Jesus Christ, not through a special class of prophetic or teaching elites.
Scripture does recognize distinct gifts and offices such as prophets and teachers (Ephesians 4:11), but it never merges these roles into a new priestly authority class. There is no biblical category for a prophet and teacher who functions as a priestly mediator or who holds governing spiritual authority over the church. The “inspired priest” is an extra biblical construct, historically associated with Bob Jones and later promoted within certain charismatic circles. It is not derived from sound exegesis.
This teaching also distorts the biblical model of leadership. Jesus directly rejected hierarchical authority structures that dominate others. “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them… It shall not be so among you” (Matthew 20:25–28). Leadership in the church is defined by servanthood, not by elevated prophetic status or priestly authority.
The New Testament is explicit. “There is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). No prophet, teacher, or leader is given priestly or mediatorial authority over believers. To claim that a prophet and teacher carries special priestly authority is to contradict the finished work of Christ.
Rather than pointing people to Christ, this doctrine elevates individuals and concentrates spiritual authority in human figures. This is the opposite of the New Testament pattern and creates conditions that easily lead to spiritual manipulation and abuse.
The “inspired priest” concept, as a prophet and teacher hybrid authority, has no biblical foundation. It undermines the priesthood of all believers and introduces unbiblical power structures into the church.
For these reasons, it should be clearly rejected.
Colossians 2:18
"Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions."
The Inspired Priest Prophecy From Cartoons Theology
.jpg)
One shocking example is claiming Ursula’s enslavement of Triton in The Little Mermaid symbolizes Satan’s grip on humanity and that reversing this is a divine mandate.
It’s absurd to use a children’s cartoon with mermaids and sea witches
to justify dominion theology.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpeg)
Authentic Worship Over Empty Rituals
I bought Metaspheres (Volume 1) after hearing the author talk about opening angelic portals and creating an atmosphere for God to interact with humans. I wanted to understand how anyone could take dominionism seriously and to explore how far off-base this theology could get. Unfortunately, this book did not disappoint in showcasing just how unbiblical and absurd these ideas are.
The author’s obsession with “portals” and “atmospheres” borders on science fiction and aligns closely with Open Theism, a heretical view that limits God’s sovereignty and places human effort at the center of divine action. This is in direct contradiction to Scripture, which teaches that God is omnipresent and does not rely on human constructs to act (Psalm 139:7-10, Acts 17:24-25).
The author’s inability to read Scripture in context is glaring. Claims about “blueprints” for taking dominion and “unlocking mysteries” reveal a shallow understanding of the Bible and a blatant disregard for its central message.
From a traditional Christian and pre-millennial pre-wrath perspective, the Bible warns of tribulation and perseverance for the Church, not cultural or political domination (Matthew 24:9-14, John 16:33).
The idea that the Church can force God’s Kingdom to manifest on earth is a dangerous distortion of the Gospel, rooted in human arrogance rather than divine truth.
This book is riddled with theological errors and over-the-top claims that God needs human effort to “create an atmosphere” for Him to work. The focus on prayer mantles, angelic portals, and dominionist rhetoric is not only unbiblical but also a distraction from the true mission of the Church.
The author’s lack of biblical understanding and inability to interpret Scripture contextually makes this book a glaring example of how far false doctrines like dominionism can lead people astray. It’s a sobering reminder of the importance of grounding our faith in God’s Word, not in human fantasies or fabricated visions.